ClareNow
Search
ClareNow
Toggle sidebar
Culture → Neutral

Why Your City Feels Built For Cars, Not People

A new book posits that physical space, rather than policy, is the primary constraint for urban transport. I speak to the authors to learn more.

Forbes 2 min read 5/10
Why Your City Feels Built For Cars, Not People
Key Takeaways
  • The average downtown in U.S. cities dedicates 60% of surface area to car infrastructure — roads, parking lots, and garages — versus just 10% for sidewalks and bike lanes, according to the book's analysis of 50 global cities.
  • Barcelona's superblocks program, which restricts car access in clusters of nine blocks, has reduced traffic by 25% and increased pedestrian space by 70% in pilot areas, serving as a key case study for physical space reallocation.
  • Tokyo achieves a modal share of 30% for bicycles and walking despite high density, largely due to narrow streets (often under 5 meters wide) that physically limit car speeds and parking availability.
  • Houston, Texas, faces a spatial paradox: 40% of its downtown land is used for parking, yet average traffic speeds are below 10 mph during rush hour because the sheer number of lanes encourages more driving.
  • The book's 'spatial index' tool ranks 50 cities on the ratio of car space to human space; cities scoring highest on walkability (Copenhagen, Amsterdam) show 2:1 ratios, while car-dependent cities (Phoenix, Dallas) exceed 8:1.
A new book argues that the primary reason cities worldwide prioritize cars over pedestrians is not policy failure but physical space constraints. The authors of 'Curbing the Car: The Space Dilemma' claim that the sheer volume of land consumed by automobiles — from roads to parking lots — leaves little room for people-friendly infrastructure, and this spatial reality is nearly impossible to reverse without radical rethinking. This revelation arrives as cities from Paris to Portland experiment with car-free zones and pedestrian plazas, but face fierce pushback from drivers and businesses. The book, written by urban planners Dr. Elena Torres and Dr. Marcus Reed, draws on decades of data from 50 global cities to show that on average, 60% of downtown surface area is dedicated to cars. 'We've boxed ourselves into a corner where the only way to move more people is to give more space to cars, which destroys the walkability that makes cities livable,' Torres explains. They argue that the bottleneck is not traffic demand but the physical geometry of streets and blocks — a problem that no amount of traffic signal optimization can solve. In Tokyo, for instance, narrow lanes and expensive parking naturally limit car use, while in Houston, sprawling lots and wide roads enforce car dependency. The book offers a controversial solution: shrink road width, eliminate minimum parking requirements, and reallocate space to micro-mobility lanes and sidewalks, even if it initially causes congestion. The authors point to Barcelona's 'superblocks' as a proof of concept, but note that such changes take a decade to gain acceptance. Critics, including the American Highway Users Alliance, call the approach 'anti-commuter' and warn of economic harm. Yet with climate goals and public health concerns mounting, the spatial argument adds a new dimension to the fray. 'The debate has always been about money and politics, but the missing piece is space,' Reed says. 'You can't build a bike lane where there's a parking garage.' The outlook is uncertain: the book advocates for a '15-minute city' model but acknowledges that retrofitting existing car-centric suburbs may be impossible without massive demolition. The next milestone is the United Nations Urban Assembly in November, where Torres and Reed will present their spatial index tool to city mayors. Whether policymakers embrace a bitter spatial pill or continue the auto-centric status quo will shape city life for generations.

"We've boxed ourselves into a corner where the only way to move more people is to give more space to cars, which destroys the walkability that makes cities livable."

"You can't build a bike lane where there's a parking garage."

Frequently Asked Questions

A new book by urban planners argues that physical space constraints, not policy alone, are the primary reason. Cars require vast amounts of land for roads and parking, leaving minimal space for sidewalks, bike lanes, and public plazas. This spatial imbalance makes it difficult to retrofit cities for people without controversial changes.

The spatial constraint refers to the physical limitation of city land. In many downtowns, 60% or more of surface area is dedicated to automobiles — either moving or parked. This leaves less than 10% for pedestrian and cycling infrastructure, creating a self-perpetuating cycle of car dependency.

Authors suggest shrinking road widths, eliminating minimum parking requirements, and reallocating space to micro-mobility lanes and wider sidewalks. Examples like Barcelona's superblocks show that restricting car access in clusters reduces traffic and increases pedestrian space, though it often faces initial public resistance.

Houston, Phoenix, and Dallas rank among the most car-centric U.S. cities in the book's analysis, with a ratio of car space to human space exceeding 8:1. In contrast, Copenhagen and Amsterdam achieve ratios closer to 2:1 through bike-friendly policies and narrow streets.

The book acknowledges it is extremely difficult and expensive. Retrofitting sprawling suburbs often requires massive demolition and rebuilding, making the 15-minute city model more feasible in dense urban cores than in suburban areas. However, incremental changes like narrowing lanes and adding crosswalks can improve walkability over time.

The spatial index is a new metric developed by the authors to measure the ratio of car-dedicated surface area to human-centric space in 50 cities. It provides a quantitative basis for comparing urban design and for city planners to set targets for rebalancing space.

Original source

www.forbes.com

Read original

Discussion

Join the discussion

Sign in to post a comment or reply.

No comments yet. Be the first to share your thoughts!

Sign in
Enter your email to receive a one-time sign-in code. No password needed.
Email address